Blurt: Seven Days Staff Blog

NOTE: Blurt has been retired and is no longer updated regularly. For new content, follow these links:

OFF MESSAGE: Vermont News and Politics
BITE CLUB: Food and Drink Blog

« Comcast, RETN Settle Contract Dispute | Main | A Good Excuse to Play Tetris »

December 12, 2009

Protesters Denounce Obama's Troop "Surge" in Afghanistan

IMG_0605 More than 100 people gathered in front of Burlington's City Hall Saturday to protest President Barack Obama's planned troop "surge" in Afghanistan.

Braving bitter winds and temperatures in the twenties, the protesters listened to a wide range of speakers, from University of Vermont students new to the anti-war movement to some of its stalwart members.

The protest is one of several being held across the nation. Several people were unable to trek to Washington, DC for a rally, so they opted for Burlington. That was the case for Peter Bartlett (pictured left), of St. Albans.

Earlier this month, President Obama announced he was adding 30,000 troops to the war effort in Afghanistan. The United States invaded Afghanistan shortly after the attacks of September 11, 2001 in an effort to track down Osama bin Laden and other Al Quaeda leaders.

The Vermont National Guard is part of that surge, and is in the midst of its largest troop deployment since World War II. It will send 1500 soldiers off to prepare for battle in the next several weeks. About 350 soldiers shipped out yesterday.

The protest, which was spearheaded by local activist Jonathan Leavitt, was sponsored by a variety of groups.

"This is the start of rebuilding the anti-war movement in Burlington," Leavitt told the crowd. "Just as Obama is calling for a surge in Afghanistan, we need a surge in the anti-war movement to bring our troops home."

Leavitt also told the hundred-plus gathered that they needed to send a message to Vermont's congressional delegation that they should do all they can to block funding for the troop surge.

"We need to hold our congressional delegation responsible for the votes they take," said Leavitt.

After Obama's speech earlier this month, Vermont's congressional trio — Sens. Patrick Leahy (D) and Bernie Sanders (I) along with Rep. Peter Welch (D) — mostly expressed concern about spending billions of dollars to fight a war in Afghanistan without much, if any, support from other nations. They also fretted about being stuck in a quagmire. None called for an immediate withdrawal of troops, and none have said if they would vote against funding the surge.

IMG_0603 However, Welch has said he supports a proposal in the House to create a "war tax" to fund the ongoing war in Afghanistan as a way to ensure needed money isn't taken from the federal treasury to assuage the effects of the recession.

Ellen David Friedman, of Vermont Labor Against the War, told the crowd that winning over the same-old anti-war protesters wasn't enough this time around.

"We need to to have some very difficult conversations with regular citizens about this surge," said David Friedman. That means conversations in the workplaces and organizations that are losing soldiers to the war effort.

David Ross, a Vietnam veteran and a member of Green Mountain Veterans for Peace, told the crowd that the United States military will no more win the hearts and minds of the Afghani people than it did the Vietnamese.

"I know what it's like to put a friend in a body bag," he told the crowd, "and that's what your brothers and sisters are doing right now over in Afghanistan. So, let's get the anti-war movement geared up and get our troops the hell out of Afghanistan."

Several speakers took issue with Obama's campaign buzzwords of "hope" and  "change" when comparing it to his planned troop surge in Afghanistan. However, at least one speaker made note that Obama's plans for Afghanistan are consistent with his campaign rhetoric.

"He told us during the campaign that he thought the war in Afghanistan was a just war," said Joseph Gainza, of Vermont Action for Peace. "A lot of us hoped it was just political rhetoric; something he needed to say in order to protect his right flank because he was on record as opposed to the Iraq War."

That hope was short-lived. Gainza warned, as did other speakers, that if the war is allowed to escalate in Afghanistan that it will likely expand more forcefully into neighboring Pakistan.

According to the protest organizers, 30 percent of all U.S. casualties in the eight-year war in Afghanistan have occurred during the 11 months of Obama's presidency. The cost of this war, with the new escalation, will be about $100 billion a year, or $2 billion every week, or more than $11 million every hour.

The protest was organized, in part, by the Peace and Justice Center, Vermont Labor Against the War, UVM Students Against War, UVM Students Stand Up, and the International Socialist Organization.

Wish I was there...

Hilarious! Keep up the good work 7D

"The protest was organized, in part, by . . . the International Socialist Organization."

Well, there's a group that's sure proved itself in the 20th and 21st centures.

@Webber Proper spelling increases the effectiveness of snark.

@Everyone It was good to see a decent crowd out today; it's time to start holding the big O's feet to the fire over his hypocrisy.

He's just doing what he said he'd do in the election.

Thanks for covering this. Thanks everybody for being there.

@ Matt: I think you meant to say "snarkiness."

Proper grammar increases the effectivess of attempted snarky retorts.


yes and Capitalism proved itself in Sept 2008 pretty well didn't it?? And in 1929. And everyday as it concentrates wealth toward the top 1 percent of the population. Oh and it sure does a great job helping humanity to live within its ecological means...

@ Mark:

Capitalism recovered/corrected after 1929 and 2008. When did socialism recover from 1918?

Hint: it didn't.

Question: do you live in a socialist regime, or a capitalist one?

Yeah, thought so.

Grow up.

it's tragic, for the world that the incompetence of the bush administration will be with us for years. obama is just trying to clean up the mess. i do feel like the taliban are as evil as the nazis were -the question is, is it any of our business? should we be forceful in darfur? should have tried to stop the rwandan genocide? were we correct to enter the bosnian war? my opinion is yes. i do hope the bush war legacy and economic debacle can be corrected ASAP- and i do have confidence in obama and liberalism to dig us out of the bush era. it's awful to be in the position of not seeing things in black and white... but there are shades of gray in the world.

More photos from Saturday's Anti-War demo here:


@ Webber

Well considering that the system needed $700 billion dollars of GOV'T spending in order to "correct itself" this time ( with a %10 unemployment equilibrium) and that the great depression only recovered after a MASSIVE infusion of GOV'T spending along with mandates, rationing and price controls then I guess I would say socialism saved the day didn't it!

Privatize profits, socialize osses. The American Way!

@ Mark:

You assume too much. Like the part about where I said capitalism was perfect. And also the part about where I said there was no role for gov't in our economy.

But let's compare. Can you show me anywhere where socialism wasn't a tragic failure? Soviet Russia? Mao's China? Eastern Europe before the fall of the Wall? North Korea?

That's what I thought.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Stuck in VT (VIDEOS)

Solid State (Music)

Mistress Maeve (Sex)

All Rights Reserved © Da Capo Publishing Inc. 1995-2012 | PO Box 1164, Burlington, VT 05402-1164 | 802-864-5684