Blurt: Seven Days Staff Blog

NOTE: Blurt has been retired and is no longer updated regularly. For new content, follow these links:

OFF MESSAGE: Vermont News and Politics
BITE CLUB: Food and Drink Blog

« Gov. Douglas Calls for 'Time Out' on Vermont Yankee | Main | Montpelier Send-Up for Artist Flo McGarrell »

January 28, 2010

How Will You Watch the Olympics?

Gettingby_1 According to a recent Zogby poll, only 29 percent of Americans in the 18-29-year-old demographic still prefer to watch TV live. The rest would rather use a DVR or watch on a DVD or website. Two-thirds of them watched some TV online in the past year.

This raises a question: What about the big events that a huge audience used to watch live, such as the Academy Awards, the Grammies and the Olympics? How will people watch them this year?

OK, I know. Many of you don't watch TV at all and have no plans to start. I applaud you. However, some of us are in an awkward in-between place. We want to watch TV in new ways, ways that might involve only paying to access content we choose, but the cable companies seem all set to make it difficult for us.

I'm one of those Vermonters who has not killed my television. However, I have killed my cable. More than $60 per month was too much to pay for a bunch of channels I mostly don't watch, such as Fox News and the various ESPNs. (According to a recent New York Times piece about why fees are so high, the cable company pays ESPN $4.10 for each subscriber who gets it — the highest fee of any network. So if you don't watch sports, that's money down the drain.)

Meanwhile, channels I did want to watch, such as Turner Classic Movies and BBC America, were only available if I bought a bigger digital package. (From what I've heard, this is not the case over at Burlington Telecom.)

So when "Battlestar Galactica" ended, I cut the cord and started renting a lot more DVDs. Thanks to the excellent selection at Waterfront Video and (yes) a certain rent-by-mail service, I started discovering shows and movies I would otherwise never have watched. I finally caught up on "The Wire."

I'm not alone. Back in November, our associate publisher and online editor Cathy Resmer wrote about watching all her favorite shows on Hulu — for free. She may not own a TV set, but she knows what's happening on "Glee."

There's even a helpful website called

But here's the thing. I can wait for season 3 of "Mad Men" to come out on DVD. I can't wait for the Oscars or the Winter Olympics.

A couple of Sundays ago, when the Golden Globes broadcast started, I felt left out. NBC claimed to have a live feed, but my older (pre-Intel) Mac couldn't handle it and crashed. Then I found a great live feed from a UK network on a site called Justin TV. The best part: Instead of long commercial breaks, it had snarky commentary from British movie critics, who are less polite than their American counterparts.

With any luck, I'll find a similar option for the Oscars. But the Olympics are a problem. NBC has big live streaming plans, yes. But you have to download Microsoft Silverlight — which, again, doesn't work with pre-Intel Macs.

Worse, it appears that you have to verify you subscribe to "a cable, satellite or IPTV provider in partnership with NBC." Way to squeeze out options, soon-to-be-Comcast-owned media conglomerate.

So I have a choice: Ask the cable company to turn back on the lowest level of cable, the one with broadcast channels, or get a receiver box so I can receive the digital signals.

Meanwhile, and more importantly, Comcast and Time Warner Inc. have teamed to concoct a little scheme called TV Everywhere that could, in the future, make it difficult or impossible for non-cable subscribers to get TV legally on the web. It would also open up way more web content to cable subscribers, for what that's worth. There's a good explanation here.

I don't believe I have a right to absolutely free TV content. There's a reason "Mad Men" is better than old broadcast shows like, say, "Dynasty" (much as I love it). Great acting, writing and production design cost. Those craftspeople deserve to be paid more than web ads can bring in.

But we need a new system that enables us to pay for only the stuff we want to watch — an à la carte type thing. Like iTunes, but with more stuff. If Comcast and other cable giants continue to hike fees without offering such options, even as TV Everywhere starts limiting web content to cable subscribers, they could face a consumer revolt in that younger demographic. The next few years will be interesting.

Any other cable cancelers out there? How are you watching the Olympics?

I cancelled my cable over a year ago. I got an HD antenna from an online store for $20 and watch all local stations for free. After that Justin TV p2p4u dot net and streamick are all good sites. Rent by mail dvd's and the service I use also allows instant streaming. There are to many changes to stay with cable for the prices they are charging without having a pay per channel solution.

That's true. Cable is too expensive.

I would like to know more about the nitty-gritty of running a cable company and whether it is a losing financial proposition for them to offer an à la carte plan. Maybe it is. But I also know particular cable companies have monopolies in many areas.

Interesting news today about the consultants' report on the potential for "saving" Burlington Telecom. I would be happy to be a BT customer. But it's not available where I live.

I've scheduled a date to have basic cable turned back on. Why? I already buy internet service from that company, and because of their pricing structure, the first 20 channels will only cost me a couple extra dollars a month. Question is, will I bother to get it turned off again if they keep raising their rates? Depends on how much, and what happens with the availability of TV online.

Media/content companies should share the blame for no a la carte pricing. Media co own many channels. So if your a cable company and need ESPN, well you are also buying all of the ESPNs as well as Disney channels or your not getting ESPN.


Very interesting article! Thanks!

I also don't subscribe to cable. I download a few shows and watch them on my iPhone when I'm at the gym. But I LOVE the winter Olympics!! Might there be websites based in other English speaking countries that I can watch? I really don't want to subscribe to cable just so I can verify to NBC that I subscribe to cable. I am willing to pay to watch the Olympics. Any ideas?

BTW, I live in New Hampshire, and many of my neighbors also don't subscribe to cable. We're mostly in the forty-something set with families. We don't want our kids watching all that crap. Of course, they've found it on YouTube, but it still seems a little easier to control. And who wants to pay $60/month for shows we can buy a la carte and watch on iPhones or watch for free on Hulu and YouTube? Still....I would be willing to pay for the Hulu and YouTube shows my kids watch, unless we have to watch the commercials. Come to think of it, it would be a good way to limit their viewing. They'd each have a budget for what they could watch....hmmmmm.....

Good point about watching the Olympics on other countries' sites, Anne... the problem is, I think they can and will block viewers in the U.S. At least, that's what I read about the Canadian networks' streaming coverage of the Games. (It's like Canadians not being able to watch Hulu for whatever weird licensing reason.) I don't know why this is true of the Olympics and not, say, the Golden Globes, but apparently it is. (Maybe because the TV networks in each nation pay so much for exclusive rights to air them?)

Here's an article about how the Canadian live stream (which sounds way better than NBC's) is "geoblocked" so we can't watch it:

Of course, you probably don't need cable to get NBC. You just need some kind of digital converter box thingie available from your local electronics store. I know someone who recently bought one. From Burlington, she can receive CBS, "fuzzy" FOX and NBC, no ABC. The site has details on what to buy and how to find out which digital broadcast channels you can receive in your area.

In case, one is wondering to give a head start to their business, it is essential to understand the relevance of the “Start” from other aspects like result and maintenance. It is important that one makes the right choice of launch pad when planning to foray into the online domain. Nirvana Canada is one of the few companies which believes in the high importance of start of a business than anything else.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Stuck in VT (VIDEOS)

Solid State (Music)

Mistress Maeve (Sex)

All Rights Reserved © Da Capo Publishing Inc. 1995-2012 | PO Box 1164, Burlington, VT 05402-1164 | 802-864-5684