IRV Repeal Signed into Law
Before about a dozen onlookers, Gov. Jim Douglas signed into law Saturday a charter change that eliminates the use of instant-runoff voting to elect Burlington's mayor.
"I'm signing this today for two reasons: One, to respect the decision of the people of Burlington, and two on the substance of the issue," said Douglas, who reminded onlookers that he was Secretary of State for 12 years.
"Voting ought to be transparent and easy to understand, and affects the will of the voters in a direct way," said Douglas. "I'm glad the city has agreed to a more traditional process."
Though it wasn't on his official public schedule, Douglas agreed to make a detour Saturday at the request of Rep. Kurt Wright (R-Burlington). Wright is also a city councilor.
The signing took place in front of the The Robert Miller Community & Recreation Center on Gosse Court in Burlington's New North End.
Wright, and a group led largely by New North End residents, successfully put a repeal of IRV on the March ballot. Voters agreed to repeal IRV by a 52-48 margin.
"This group may have been outspent, but they had heart," said Wright, in reference to IRV proponents who raised money from groups outside of Burlington, including FairVote and the Vermont Public Interest Research Group.
Joining Wright and the governor were: City Councilor Vince Dober (R-Ward 7), David Hartnett and Democrats Sandy Baird, Jane and John Ewing and State Sen. Hinda Miller (D-Chittenden).
The signing pen went to Harnett, who helped to organize the IRV repeal effort.
"We were outspent, but we certainly weren't outworked," said Hartnett, who sent out thanks to Lea Terhune, Chuck Seleen and Linda Chagnon who weren't able to make the signing ceremony but whom Harnett said were instrumental in getting the measure passed.
"I feel a lot better now that IRV won't play a role in 2012," said Harnett. That's the next time a mayoral election will be held in Burlington.
The results of the 2009 election sparked an outcry that IRV had somehow robbed Wright of the mayor's office. Wright led incumbent Progressive Bob Kiss through the first several rounds of voting, but eventually Kiss accumulated enough second-place votes to best Wright.
The IRV repeal effort seemed stagnant until news of Burlington Telecom's financial troubles went public in the fall. Then, it seemed to gather steam and by March the anti-Kiss sentiment appeared to crest and the vote in March was seen as both a referendum on the voting system itself, as well as one on Kiss and his administration.
Overall, IRV lost by a 52-48 margin, but it was defeated resoundingly in the New North End Wards 4 and 7, and barely survived in Ward 6. Support was strong in the other four wards, but turnout there was much lower.
Here's how the IRV vote broke down by ward:
Ward 1: 405 to keep, 264 to repeal
Ward 2: 428 to keep, 185 to repeal
Ward 3: 510 to keep, 292 to repeal
Ward 4: 1203 to repeal, 606 to keep
Ward 5: 793 to keep, 545 to repeal
Ward 6: 490 to keep, 477 to repeal
Ward 7: 1006 to repeal, 437 to keep
The rejection of IRV, coupled with the defeat of several Progressive candidates and one Democratic ally of Kiss, led one city councilor to call for Kiss to resign.
A couple of editing suggestions...
Wright led incumbent Progressive Progressive incumbent Bob Kiss through the first several two rounds of voting, but eventually in the third round, Kiss accumulated enough second-place votes to best Wright.
Posted by: Haik Bedrosian | April 26, 2010 at 04:01 PM
the issue will be back, don't worry. Sour grapes isnt' reason enough to stop it.
Posted by: Jimmy | April 26, 2010 at 06:05 PM
Nice job accurately describing how IRV works Haik. Now, what's your point? Oh never mind Jimmy already mentioned your point...Sour grapes
Posted by: Matthew Lyons | April 26, 2010 at 06:15 PM
...and vince dober is hot. there, i said it.
Posted by: Jimmy | April 26, 2010 at 06:20 PM
Interesting to note the absence of Mayor Kiss at the signing of a most important piece of legislation that affects the very city that he is the elected leader of. Anyone got the answers?
Posted by: dale tillotson | April 26, 2010 at 10:28 PM
An apparently thoroughly bitter Fake Jimmy strikes again!
BTW, the tallies listed above reflect an increase in each of the wards' opposition to IRV of a minimum of 24%. Sorry to drop some substance into these comment threads, but it's a pretty glaring omission to this particular post.
Posted by: Jimmy | April 26, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Nice try fake Jimmy. IRV worked fine and you know it. Dale, really? The embarrassment is that Douglas would drive to Burlington to sign it into law.
Posted by: Jimmy | April 27, 2010 at 07:03 AM
Nice job accurately describing how IRV works Haik. Now, what's your point? Oh never mind Jimmy already mentioned your point...Sour grapes
I made no description of how IRV works. I offered some editing suggestions for a paragraph in a story about IRV.
I have never felt anything like "sour grapes" when it came to IRV. I never agreed with using it and I'm happy it's repealed, but I was happy Bob Kiss won both of his races. He was my first choice vote both times.
Your comment was silly.
Posted by: Haik Bedrosian | April 27, 2010 at 07:30 AM
The only sour grapes evident here are the pro IRV whiners. It was voted in with a smaller vote than it was voted out with. It was used in 2 elections. It was given a fair chance. Burlingtonians decided they didn't like it. They voted it out, again with a bigger voter turnout and a bigger percentage than it was voted in with. Democracy prevailed. Now stop whining and move on.
And the guy who insists on using Jimmy's name is truly an ass.
Posted by: sean | April 27, 2010 at 07:50 AM
Ah, "Fake Jimmy," another Prog strategy that smells like it was cooked up by my seven year old nephew. Keep embarrassing your party and yourself, FJ, and dry your crocodile tears over IRV because it's gone for good.
Posted by: Jimmy | April 27, 2010 at 09:29 AM